home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- stranahan writes:
-
- I think a lot of people will look at what they get for their money with a
- $20,000 license every year and decide to gamble a grand on a fully
- professional level program that used to make dozens of TV shows and
- movies, today. If it was YOUR money, wouldn't you look? I thought so...
- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
-
- Lee,
-
- Believe me I looked at it closely. I spent 9 months deciding on what
- platform to help keep up with the broadcast market. Yes, Lightwave is
- remarkably powerful for it's price, and it runs on a easy to afford
- computer. But you always seem to overlook other facts in your posts.
-
- To get Lightwave to equal the speed of the SGI, I would have spent the
- same amount on Amigas as the SGI. There is no cost savings in that.
-
- I can render 5 seconds of broadcast quality animation on our SGI in less
- than 24 hours. Usually far less depending on complexity. Can 5 seconds be
- rendered on your "cost effective platform" in less than 24 hours or does
- it take a Screamer and all the other goodies that push the cost into the
- low-end SGI range? This is more to the equation than just the software
- cost.
-
- Yes, the software is less expensive, but there are also other benefits to
- that for the professional who *needs* special care. With the extra money
- spent on the software, Alias can afford the best in Tech support. I have
- Alias PowerAnimator and their tech support is the best.
-
- I have never been on hold for more than 1 to 3 minutes before getting
- through to a great tech who answers my question, they are willing to do
- anything to solve the problem. I have had them call me back three days in
- a row just checking on the problem to make sure it was not causing
- problems. THAT is service. I will gladly pay extra for that. In a
- professional environment time=money. If you are just a hobbyist time is
- not so valuable. But that is not the argument here. You are talking about
- LW for the Professional market against SGI stuff.
-
- Your comments on LW being what somone can afford. We started five years
- ago on Macs using Strata. Pretty much anyone who can afford LW can (now)
- get a PowerMac 6100 and Strata for the same price. Probably faster that an
- cheap PC or Amiga too. Great upgrade path to the faster PPC coming out.
- Learning the tools and environment is negligible. I switched to
- PowerAnimator's tool set in less than two weeks. In fact I found it easier
- than the Mac. Once an artist has the knowledge and understands the
- concepts of 3D; the platform or really software doesn't matter.
-
- And for the cost of the High end programs there are extras, does LW
- support true particles and all the "cutting edge" stuff. IK is kind of old
- news, Metaballs are old too. But simulating snow, fire, rain all in a 3D
- space it what is hot. v5.1.1 of Alias just supports 2D of particles in
- OptiFX but 6.0 is due out next week with 3D support like Wavefront. Again,
- sometimes the cost of producing these tools in higher, copying what
- another has already developed is much cheaper. Kind of like Apple and
- Microsoft.
-
- Dann M. Stubbs
- DSD
-
-
-
-